PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT
THROUGH STANDARD SETTINGS
We are aware that at
present about 95 percent of fabric is being produced in decentralized sectors
of India. Remaining only 5 percent of total volume of fabric is produced by the
organized sector. Previously, the small-scale units were working with power
looms. Now, there are many units with automatic looms like Cimco, Ruti B, and
Ruti C looms. There are units with shuttle-less looms also.
The scenario of fabric manufacturing is
changing, though at slow pace. The small-scale units are gradually shifting
from power looms to the automatic and shuttle-less looms. This is imperative in
the era of GATT and WTO; to have competitive edge over other countries in the
international market. Today, the customers ask to supply the fabric produced on
the automatic or shuttle-less looms. This has forced the small units to adopt
these technologies. It is because these types of looms guarantee quality and
production. As such, it is expected in near future that many entrepreneurs will
shift to automatic and shuttle-less looms.
One of the drawbacks of the fabric
manufacturing in decentralized sector is that, many unit owners are reluctant
to employ the qualified and experienced technical staff. Rather, the machine
over looker is paid much higher wages and they are handed over the total
responsibility of the shed. It is observed that the over looker can practically
work on the looms and put the looms in production. But, he cannot pay more
attention to correct settings of the different mechanisms, periodical checking
of the critical motions, preventive maintenance of the looms and many such
important aspects that affect the performance of the looms. This results in
deteriorating the quality and the productivity of the looms. This in turn
results in the non-realisation of the price offered by the customers as they
refuse to pay on the pretexts of bad quality. This indicates the scope for
improvement in the performance of small units through standardized machine
settings and preventive maintenance.
Sulzer is a well-known successful name
in the shuttle-less weaving. It is known of this machine that, its design is
complex and the parts are made with high precision. Therefore, the accuracy of
the settings is most important for good performance of the machine with respect
to quality, productivity and brakeage of the critical parts like gripper,
picking shoe etc. These parts are very costly.
In reputed organised mills the
performance is much higher due to proper maintenance of all the aspects needed
for it. One of the students from this institute collected detailed information
regarding the settings to be kept on different models of Sulzer looms. These
were followed in that esteemed mill in Mumbai.
On his return, the information collected
by him was examined carefully for its usefulness in the local units. In
Ichalkaranji, there are two weaving sheds with Sulzer looms. A visit was made
to this unit to observe the performance. It was found that the efficiency of
the shed was much less and the breakage of the grippers was more compared to
the mill in Mumbai. Therefore, it was thought to make use of the information
collected to improve the performance of the shed.
At the out set discussions were held
with the unit owner regarding this. After his consent, first, study was
undertaken to assess the performance with the settings kept by the over looker
in this unit. These settings were noted. The performance of the shed was assed
on the basis of following:
1.
Average production of fabric per day
2.
Efficiency
percent
3.
Fabric
faults per 100 meters
4.
Breakdown
of parts
The observations were
carried out for about one and half month. The observations are tabulated in
table 1.
Table 1
Average production of fabric per day |
|
Efficiency |
|
Average faults per 100 meters |
|
Break down of grippers |
|
End break rate |
|
Weft break rate |
|
The table 2 gives the list of the
settings kept by the over looker of the shed and the settings suggested. The
suggested settings were done on the looms at the time of new beam gaiting. Few
looms were personally monitored for the correct implementation of the new
settings. Over the period of two months all looms were made to work with new
settings.
Sr. No. |
Description
|
Old setting |
New setting |
1 |
Marks and keyways on shafts in receiving unit, middle tucking
unit & on let cam plate |
Slightly wrong |
Straight up |
2 |
Shed crossing |
50 |
100 |
3 |
Distance between feeder gripper & scissors |
0.55 mm |
0.2 mm |
4 |
Opener entry in gripper |
00 |
100 |
5 |
Selvedge gripper (mm) |
H-73, V-120 |
H-71, V-120.5 |
6 |
Scissor rack adjustment |
2 mm |
2.5 mm |
7 |
Scissor cam plate adjustment |
134 and 4.1 mm |
133 and 4.4 mm |
8 |
Change of pick gears |
Loosely fitted |
Tightly fitted |
9 |
Height of cloth support |
45 mm |
47 mm |
10 |
Feeder opener adjustment |
103 mm |
101 mm |
11 |
Zero adjustment of torsion bar-gap between roller and picking
cam |
0.1 mm |
0.2 mm |
12 |
Picking lever adjustment- gap between picking shoe and
projectile |
0.15 mm |
0.20 mm |
13 |
Gap between expeller lever and expelled projectile position I |
1.5 mm |
2 mm |
14 |
Upper position of projectile lifter above picking block |
0.3 mm |
0.4 mm |
15 |
Gap between expeller lever and expelled projectile position II |
2 mm |
1.5 mm |
16 |
Warp detector stop |
2750 |
3000 |
17 |
Projectile detector setting |
1.5 mm |
0.8 mm |
Table
2 Contd …
Sr. No. |
Description
|
Old setting
|
New setting |
18 |
Expeller position IV |
1.6 mm |
1.5 mm |
19 |
Shed height adjustment |
2 mm |
3 mm |
20 |
Warp stop cam adjustment |
7.8 mm |
8 mm |
21 |
Adjustment of torsion bar twist |
280 |
330 |
The correct settings of the shedding as
stated in (2) and (19) were responsible for the reduced end breakage rate due
to loose ends. This in turn resulted increased efficiency. The settings related
to the gripper expeller and entry of the hook in the gripper jaws (4, 13, 15,
and 18,) ensured the exact penetration of the hook in the dead center of the
jaws. Due to this gripper breakage is reduced substantially. The tight fitting
of the pick gears (8)eliminated the incidences of the starting marks. The
adjustments related to the feeder, scissor rack and cam (5, 6, and 7,) resulted
in the reduction of the weft related stoppages and defects. The setting of the
warp detector stop (16 and 20) eliminated the warp stop motion failure due to
this setting. Thus, reducing the defects related to the warp stop motion.
Study was taken to know the effect of
new settings after the completion of the change of the settings on all the
looms.
Table 3 indicates the results after the
new settings.
Table 2
Average production of fabric per day |
|
Efficiency |
|
Average faults per 100 meters |
|
Break down of grippers |
|
End break rate |
|
Weft break rate |
|
The same was conformed by the unit owner
through a certificate issued by him.